This page provides you with on-line resources for the course. Nothing here is a replacement for attending lecture but the sites we link may fill in gaps in your background. Remember, you are responsible for filling in the gaps! Try some online problems-- Genetics has an intuitive component and practice really does help.
Questions? Don't wait to speak to the faculty. We are glad to help you and we will arrange office hours to meet with you.
Contents
Faculty, Text, and Lectures| Course instructors | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | office | telephone | |
| Lorraine Pillus Professor (course director) | 2100A Pacific Hall | 822 2442 | lpillus@ucsd.edu |
|
Susan Forsburg Associate Professor | Salk Institute-MCBL | 453 4100 x 1341 | |
| Muriel Nesbitt Associate Professor | 4070E York Hall | 534 0564 | mnesbitt@ucsd.edu |
|
Bill Schafer Associate Professor | 4402/4401 Bonner Hall | 822-0508 | wschafer@ucsd.edu |
| Questions related to individual lectures or individual problem sets should be directed to the appropriate instructor. Issues about the course overall, its logisitics, or other programatic concerns should be addressed to Dr Pillus (course director). | |||
Text
Advanced Genetic Analysis: finding meaning in a genome (20). R.S. Hawley and M. Y. Walker. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 239 pp.
This book is available in the UCSD bookstore. It is a nice paperback volume that will be a great reference for your future. It is anticipated that you will use the table of contents to read appropriate sections as necessary without requiring specific assignments Please read Chapter 1 after Lecture 1
Lecture Schedule. Important: this schedule is subject to change!
Classes usually meet Monday and Wednesday 9-12, with some Friday dates as indicated. in 3500 Pacific Hall (P)
| date | where | who | topic |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31 Mar 04 | P | Pillus Forsburg | Course intro and survey Genetics 101: Mendel and Morgan |
| 7 Apr 04 | P | Nesbitt | Quantitative thinking in genetics |
| 9 Apr 04 | P | Forsburg | Bacterial and phage genetics I |
| 12 Apr 04 | P | Forsburg | Bacterial and phage genetics II |
| 14 Apr 04 | P | Forsburg | Yeast Genetics I |
| Problem Set I | |||
| 19 Apr 04 | P | Forsburg | Yeast genetics II |
| 20 Apr 04 San Diego Cell Biology Meeting, de Hoffmann Auditorium, The Salk Institute | |||
| 21 Apr 04 | P | Schafer | Genetic model systems |
| Problem Set I due | |||
| 23 Apr 04 | P | Schafer | A case study - C. elegans |
| Problem Set II | |||
| 26 Apr 04 | P | Schafer | AFTERNOON Special Behavioral Genetics Symposium |
| 28 Apr 04 | P | Schafer | Mosaic analysis and further thoughts on epistasis |
| 03 May 04 | P | Schafer | |
| 05 May 04 | P | Pillus | Mutational Analysis I |
| Problem Set II due | |||
| 10 May 04 | P | Pillus | Mutational Analysis II |
| 12 May 04 | P | Pillus | Mutational Analysis III |
| Problem Set III | |||
| 14 May 04 | P | Pillus | Genetic Suppression and Epistasis |
| 17 May 04 | P | Pillus | Genetic approaches to macromolecular complexes |
| 19 May 04 | P | Nesbitt | Mammalian genomes and karyotype |
| Problem Set III due | |||
| 21 May 04 | P | Nesbitt | Linkage and mapping |
| 24 May 04 | P | Nesbitt | Imprinting |
| Problem Set IV | |||
| 26 May 04 | P | Nesbitt | Cancer genetics |
| TBD | Problem Set IV due | ||
Homework policy
|
Grades 1 Outstanding 2 Very Good 3 Satisfactory 4 Unsatisfactory 5 Poor 6 Very bad
|
There will be four graded homework assignments. These will sample the array of topics covered during the course. Many of the questions are modeled after past first-year exams, so it pays to put your effort into doing them. Expect the problem sets to be challenging, but to build on the principles presented in lecture. Information about where and when to turn in assignments will provided in lecture. To complete this course successfully(ie, pass the class) you must attend lecture and pass these assignments. If you know you are going to miss an assignment, or you miss one because of illness, be sure to talk to the faculty about makeups! Grades are based on the numerical average of the four homework assignments. 1.0 - 3.0 is passing, greater than 3.0 is not. If you fail more than one assignment, you will not pass the class. |
You are welcome to study together on the problems, which is often helpful, and you are encouraged to consult with the faculty. However, the work you hand in must be identifiably your own. Discuss the problems in your study group and then go home and write up your answers alone. Do not look for or copy answers to problem sets from old keys; do not copy information from other sources. Cheating, plagiarism, or dishonesty will not be tolerated in this course , just as it is not tolerated in science. You may wish to review the UCSD Policy on the Integrity of Scholarship. If you have any questions, please speak to one of the faculty.
If you encounter difficulties on the problem sets, seek help sooner rather than later! The faculty is more than willing to assist you in developing problem-solving strategies. Most students who have had problems in this class do so because they did not seek assistance soon enough. Be proactive.
Problems| Problem sets | Practice Problems |
|---|---|
| Problem Set 1 (Forsburg; pdf format) | Practice problem ) (Forsburg; will be solved in class 19 Apr) |
Overheads and reading lists | Reading and background | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||
| Powerpoint and figures | |||
Recommended seminars| Date | Speaker | Title |
|---|---|---|
| 07 Apr 04 4pm, CMG Auditorium | Adam Kuspa | Genomics and Genetics in Dictyostellium |
| 14 Apr 04 4pm, CMG Auditorium | John Collier | Anthrax Toxin Biology |
| 21 Apr 04 4pm, CMG Auditorium | Richard Novick | Staph Biology |
| 5 May 04 4pm, CMG Auditorium | Rex Kerr | Kamen Prize Lectureship: Sensory Neuron Activity in C. elegans |
What is genetics?
BackgroundBasic Information and overviews
Classic papers
Terminology
Meiosis
Need more?
Systems/TopicsMethods and Technology, including genomics
The tools
Local Info
Ockham's Razor
Non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatum. (Entities are not to be multiplied beyond necessity) Ockham's razor is not an excuse or an explanation for biology as it is. It is a philosophical strategy for solving problems! Start with the simple, and let the data lead you to the complexity. If the data do not fit the simple model, then it is the simple model that is wrong, not the data. That is, you can't use Ockham as an excuse to ignore the outlying data. However, if the data fit the simplest model, then Ockham says you have no reason to develop a more complex model. At least, not yet--not until you have more data!
What happens in biology is that we keep doing experiments even when we have a model. That is because our role is always to challenge the hypothesis (never to prove it, always to disprove it). Inevitably the simple model will fall, because biology is not simple and eventually we get data that do not fit.
That's all Ockham tells us--but it's a great deal. In practical terms, what Ockham's razor means is that we develop hypotheses by determining the most parsimonious, uncomplicated model that is consistent with all of our data. Then we bootstrap ourselves to a more complicated model by vigorously challenging the first one.
"William of Ockham, a Franciscan monk, was born around 1290 in Surrey, and died in Munich. He studied at Oxford
University and wrote extensively on the theological and philosophical issues of the time. By the principle later known as 'Ockham's Razor,' he insisted that ' what can be done with fewer.... is done in vain with more'. Denounced as a heretic to Pope John XXII, he was summoned to Avignon in 1324 where he got into further hot water and entirely rejected the secular authority of the papacy. William fled to the service of the Emperor Louis of Bavaria in 1328, almost certainly dying of the plague that ravaged Europe in 1349."
from http://www.eclipse.co.uk/pens/folder1/ockham.html
3/24/04 revised and updated.
© S. L Forsburg
Made on a Macintosh.